The significance of this day to the Democratic Republic of Germany cannot be overemphasized, at least the government of the Democratic Republic of Germany promotes it this way, but in fact, the greatest significance of this meeting is the Triple Entente. Regarding the traditional allies from the First World War, how To maintain peace and development in Europe, the premise is that there is no US role.

Before the formal talks, Mrs. Thatcher and Mitterrand had an in-depth discussion, reaffirming the leading role of Britain and France in Europe. Regarding the relationship between Britain, France and the Soviet Union, the two had a basic consensus that they must stand together and deal with it together. The Soviet Union, because of the national strength of the three countries, the Soviet Union belongs to the relatively strong side, and the cornerstone of the future British and French allies is the basis for the European peace framework to go forward.

The difficulties of the Soviet Union were temporary. If they did not show sincerity to balance the disadvantages of Britain and France, this meeting would not be possible at all. Mitterrand also said that the balance of military power is very important.

Mrs. Thatcher revealed that Britain has been working very hard to balance the Soviet Union in terms of military power. Britain will definitely not use money to solve the Soviet Union's economic difficulties in vain. It will use military concessions in exchange. Mitterrand deeply agrees and agrees .

"France is willing to help with arms purchases if the price is right." Mitterrand is also very interested in purchasing Soviet armaments, which are relatively cheap after all.

The more Britain and France buy, the faster the Soviet Union's numbing military power will be reduced. Mitterrand doesn't think this is a disadvantage. After all, it is more appropriate for the Soviet Union to keep these military equipment in their own hands. , France is not without a place to store, for example, North Africa is very suitable for storage.

What's more, the Soviet Union is willing to share the economic and political power that it monopolizes Eastern European countries. This is something that no amount of money can buy, and it can be called an extremely cost-effective deal.

Indeed, if Alan Wilson didn't know the history of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, he might really think that this deal is extremely cost-effective. Of course, in the eyes of others except him, this deal is just as cost-effective.

Not monopolizing Eastern Europe and willing to share with Britain and France is satisfactory enough in the current situation.

Shevardnadze has a heavy responsibility. He knows that his position in the Soviet Union will be established in this meeting, but immediately, he knows that the task is not easy. Fortunately, the cultural tsar Fultseva also came secretly. Can advise him.

In the past five or six years, the details of the Soviet Union have been figured out. Britain and France will not be deceived. This time, the British Prime Minister and the French President came here with sincerity. It is not impossible to give money to solve the difficulties of the Soviet Union, but one size fits all The codes are all exchanged by the Soviet Union.

Of course, what Alan Wilson valued most was something that the Soviet Union and even the entire socialist country did not value, but something that was extremely important to the UK, that is, the share of international trade settlements in pounds.

As for the second most important thing, that is the division of the European banking system shared with the French, just like the previous discussion with the French, the UK wants the Democratic Germany and Poland, and the rest belongs to the French division plan.

"Forty-six years." Alan Wilson faced the same opponent at the Potsdam Conference, Fultseva, the deputy director of the Soviet Advisory Committee. , Belonging to two countries until today, it is embarrassing. …

Fultseva looked at each other silently, and murmured in a low voice, "You must be very proud now. The current situation in the Soviet Union is similar to the situation in Britain back then."

In this life, I will never see Maomei being wronged! Although he is a little older, but the feelings are still there, Alan Wilson comforted, "Actually, as long as the Soviet Union does not seek to dominate the world, it is not easy to develop well. The United States is the enemy of the Soviet Union's development. As for the UK, our size determines , will not take this matter seriously."

Before the First World War, the United States had already surpassed the total economic volume of the United Kingdom, but this data exceeded that of the British mainland, not the British Empire including colonies. At that time, Britain, as the hegemon of the world, even though its economic aggregate was not as good as that of the United States, far surpassed the United States in many stock data, and it was able to suppress the United States so that it did not dare to act rashly.

Alan Wilson knows that the size of the UK is doomed not to regain the crown of the first place in the total. In the future, with a population of nearly 100 million people, getting a per capita data that is a bit higher than other developed countries is already worthy of his lifelong struggle up.

Even Alan Wilson hopes that other countries will quickly balance the economic aggregate of the United States, so that the United Kingdom will have a chance to sit firmly as the arbiter.

Now that France has expressed interest in arms sales, the United Kingdom immediately adjusted its focus and put the focus of arms sales on the navy. The Royal Navy still has room to strengthen its strength.

After all, as one of the world's top three navies, the total tonnage of the U.S. Navy is not far behind. What if there are some active warships in the Red Navy? This will be a landmark event.

Alan Wilson believes that the Royal Navy is stronger than the surface fleet, so the focus of reinforcement should be on the submarine force, and this is precisely what the Soviet Union is good at. The Soviet Red Navy has 660 submarines, half of which are conventional Submarines are generally nuclear submarines, and there are more than 300 of these two types of submarines.

Of course, the surface fleet should not be let go. The Hyundai and Glory classes can be placed in Malaya, and let the Royal Pacific Fleet try another route. Don’t let a certain big country really understand the anti-ship ballistic missile one day. The United Kingdom is catching up from the beginning. It is necessary to know that the lack of size means that the United Kingdom must not make mistakes in the route. Once it goes the wrong way, it will be extremely difficult to catch up.

This is especially the case with the navy, which is the service that best embodies the law of the jungle rather than the tradition of the **** navy.

Let's put it this way, if the People's Navy suddenly comes up with a formation of twenty aircraft carriers, and the number of the U.S. Navy remains the same, even if the U.S. Navy has long-term experience in using it and understands various favorable factors in the oceans and seas, it will still be blown away. .

The army can persevere with an arduous spirit. The navy is different. If the ship sinks, it will drown and there will be no second end.

Conventional submarines are a weak project of the UK, because the UK was not good at submarines, and after the war, it was transferred to nuclear submarines. Conventional submarines gradually gave up. The latest conventional submarine is the Advocate class, and it is only in service. It is obvious that it cannot compare with the Soviet Union in terms of manufacturing experience.

Alan Wilson took a fancy to the Kirov class of the Soviet Union. Of course, Alan Wilson also said like Fultseva that he would not reject the Shark-class and Typhoon nuclear submarines. He also wanted to see what the nuclear submarine with the largest tonnage in the world has. Excellence. …

"That's the crystallization of military talents in the Soviet Union for decades." Fultseva was indignant, this man is really good at picking.

"The wages are almost out of reach. The typhoon level is kept, and the Soviet Union can't afford it. It's better to show my sincerity. I am selling arms, not for nothing." Alan Wilson reminded softly that such remarks were included in his In the ear, usually only one subtext can be analyzed, and you need to pay more!

Besides, isn’t the Borei God under construction? The Soviet Union can completely replace the Typhoon class, just like the Kuznetsov class replaced the Kiev class. What is not sustainable development?

In fact, these seem to be extremely important, but what is really valued by everyone in the UK this time is precisely what the Soviet Union paid the least attention to. What the UK wants is the hegemony of the pound sterling brought about by the international trade settlement of the Warsaw Pact countries. This is a socialist country on the contrary. The most neglected, least valued place.

The Soviets didn't know about this at all. Even if the agreement was finally known to the entire Soviets, the Soviets would not care, because the banks in the Soviet Union could only save money.

But British banks can do a lot of things. Britain will take advantage of it, but the Soviet Union will not suffer, because the Soviet Union has never had financial hegemony. In the Soviet Union's understanding, this is only something that exists objectively, and even objective existence is a thing. I only realized it after the map head came on stage.

The stock exchange in the Soviet Union was established last year, and it is still a month and a year away. How can this kind of understanding be cultivated?

As for arms sales, in fact, the armaments to be purchased by Britain and France do not cost much. T55 and T62 are main battle tanks from the 1950s and 1960s. Even if the number exceeds 10,000, how much value can they have in terms of value? It’s just that the fighting is different. The purchase of these tanks is for the safety of Europe. The two leaders of the European Community, Britain and France, agreed to purchase for the peace of mind of other countries.

Afterwards, not only would Britain and France not say that they had taken advantage, but they would also make public opinions that they were at a disadvantage, showing that the two countries had paid too much for the security of Europe.

Of course, this is still not enough. Since the three countries of Britain, France and the Soviet Union are preparing to return to the good era of the Triple Entente, there is no need to keep the Soviet Union’s tactical nuclear weapons. If it poses a threat to any European country, please aim at the United States if you want to threaten.

This is a grand event of unity~lightnovelpub.net~Although the head of the Soviet Union's map is not in Berlin, it doesn't matter. Margaret Thatcher and Mitterrand found that the relationship between Britain and France seems to have never been so good.

Even if the economic strength of Britain and France is not weak, it is impossible to spend all the money for military equipment of the size of the Soviet Union at once. Therefore, the two countries proposed to formulate a five-year plan that the Soviet Union is very familiar with, and promise to accept the Soviet Union's willingness to negotiate step by step. Talk about the Eastern European sphere of influence.

After discussing with Fortseva, Shevardnadze decided to inform the head of the map of the conditions of Britain and France. After getting the approval of the head of the map, he expressed that he had no objection to this request.

At the same time, this is to express sincerity to the Soviet Union. At the same time, it also makes mutual security guarantees in black and white. Alan Wilson suggested that Prime Minister Thatcher propose to Shevardnadze that February next year will be the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the Queen's accession to the throne. For the grand military parade, the Soviet Red Navy and the French Navy are invited to participate.

"This will show the important position of the British Empire in this world, that is, two or three months later." Alan Wilson said in the tone of a lord. He has always been a royalist.

Please remember the first domain name of this book: . :