Discuss rationally, don't fire.

I don't think there is any problem about the death of Mark. In the history of the United States, 4 presidents died of assassinations, and 5 others almost died in the hands of assassins. Most of these assassins were alone with a gun, wearing a trench coat and a hat, and then piu the crowd to end a president of a hegemonic empire. So I want to ask a question here, how could a heroic character die so simply?

Why did n’t the political blocs and mafia behind the killers, and why the consortiums that motivated the assassination did not handle it, the president should stand up for two days without a shot and stand up for 300 rounds with these people. How can it be so simple? Dead?

Since then, another question has been raised. Mark did not bring a bodyguard. Why did he not bring a bodyguard? This problem is troublesome to explain. If a reader has participated in a slightly higher level salon, it should be understood that no one will take casual people such as bodyguards to such places. If I want to explain this matter clearly, so that everyone can see at a glance that even the brain does not need to tremble, it may take tens of thousands of words to describe, so stop and stop, don't say more.

Violence is not the best way, but it is the most effective way. In countries across the ocean, these presidents are dead because they are unwilling to compromise and bow their heads. There may be brief confrontations in peaceful ways, such as negotiations, consultations, threats and the like. But after these inefficiency, those people still chose the simplest method-physical destruction of the spirit.

This is not whether there is a bodyguard, is it something that a fool can solve?

It turns out that a dead person will never bargain with you and will not make you angry, and all you pay is a bullet or a few.

I asked myself not to say how good I wrote, but I can say that I tried to be as close as possible to the style of that era. Some forces were outrageous in their attitudes and methods towards their opponents, more exaggerated than what is described in my book.

Maybe some of the bookmates' understanding of a particular era comes from some film and television works, such as the movies you mentioned, I have never seen. The purpose of making film and television works is to show money, so there are many things that will not be shown to everyone unless they don't want to be shown, don't want to make money, or even live.

Gossip here, it ’s time for me to go out, meow meow

Genius remember the address of this site in a second: .. Mobile version reading URL: m.