Recently, many people on the Internet are slamming me and saying that I have disturbed the industry order. So what is the industry order?

Industry order, I think it should include a variety of technical market order, talent market order, business market order, investment development order and so on. I am not an expert. I can't say the professional nouns. I will talk about my views from the perspective of consumers today.

As a consumer of it products, I use the most intuitive computer as an example. I want to buy a computer, there are two ways to order online and buy in a physical store.

To use a computer, in addition to buying this computer, I also need to install the software I need to use.

So I plan to buy a computer, the cost is 6,000 yuan rmb, fancy a computer that sells for 5,999 yuan, but when I actually buy it, the cost will be higher than this.

Because I have to install software, the most basic, I have to install the system. There are two choices for this mainstream, one is to think of Yinshan's xos CD and Microsoft's vista CD.

The former retail price of 499 yuan rmb, if it is a pre-installed system, then the price should be 199 yuan. And what about Microsoft? The retail price is several times, even if it is a pre-installed system, the price is close to 1,000 yuan.

This is not that you have to buy a desktop computer, you usually need a patch panel, you need a network cable, you also need to install the network, these related products, is a sum of money.

So the money we actually buy from the computer = computer cost + software price + shop cost + accessory price + profit

What is the real cost of a computer inside? What is the profit? Who earned the biggest profit?

The rent of the store, the profit of the agent, the profit of the pc manufacturer, the profit of the software manufacturer... There are too many people who divide the money.

Who is the highest profit margin? Microsoft.

Microsoft called the development of vista, which invested billions of dollars, but where did the tens of billions of dollars come from? Selling xp system earned, they rely on the xp system to earn profits, enough to develop vista and xp a dozen times!

Where is the wealth of Bill Gates, all Microsoft. What about my wealth? From a variety of investments, the profits from its investment are not big in all of my income.

I only invest in a lot of industries, each of which can bring in a little profit in the future. When combined, it will increase my income a lot.

Having said that, as consumers, we all want to buy the products at a lower price. However, as a producer and seller, it is hoped that the profit will be high enough.

How to form a balance between the two, I think it is best to use the concept of supermarkets. Simply put, it is small profits but quick turnover.

I want to build a computer industry with small profits but quick turnover. Whether it is hardware or software, manufacturers must have profits, but the profit of single products should not be so high.

Now I have invested in various hardware accessories, invested in software, and invested in PC manufacturers, which is to give consumers a reasonable price.

And what about the results? I touched the interests of those manufacturers. They joined forces, attacked me, slandered me, and said that I am destroying the order of the industry.

Keeping high profits, even if the products can't be sold, they won't sell at a reduced price. Is this their order?

Define computers as high-end electronics, not ordinary household appliances. Is this their order?

Some people cut prices and give profits to consumers, is it against the order?

If these are what they call industry order, then I would say that the companies I invest in will not follow these "orders"!

They made the order a shackle, wanted to lock in other businesses, lock in profits, let consumers follow them, and let consumers stay in the dark.

I am going to break this shackle, break the order, and re-establish a new, rational order!

Many people used Bill Gates as an example, dropped out of school and established a huge Microsoft emperor, but if Paul Ellen was not in the first place, how could Bill Gates succeed?

And many people may not be very clear, Bill Gates's mother, who was a friend of ibm's chairman and CEO, who worked together, she is an executive of an intercontinental bank.

This is why the original software of Bill Gates, why can be sold to ibm, why Microsoft's dos can get ibm promotion, and with the help of ibm, become the industry standard.

Going to school and doing business does not conflict with itself. I finished my studies, so today I am able to surpass Bill Gates in wealth.

Those who drop out of school as a golden rule and think that the world is not waiting for people are blinded by this story. I don't deny that Bill Gates is excellent, but don't forget that Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer, who started out with him, didn't have their efforts. Without the help of Bill's mother, there would be no Microsoft. Today.

What I am saying is that Bill Gates is not a good example. Our young people, don't learn, unless your mother has an unparalleled background.

Let's talk about Intel, and has always advertised that its products are the best in the world, but in the testimony of hundreds of media around the world, their products have been defeated by Chaowei Semiconductor.

We should be aware that the larger the output of most standard products, the lower the cost should be. However, the output of Intel is obviously higher than that of Chaowei, and its performance is the same as that of Chaowei. It is not even as good as Chaowei, but the price is much higher.

So relatively speaking, the profit of Intel is much higher.

The price of Chaowei at this time can guarantee normal profit. According to the statement, the profit at the same price should be higher. If not, then there are only two possibilities.

The first one, the Internet, lies. Second, the technology of the Internet is not as good as super. As for which one, I am also very curious.

If you lie and lie, then their profits are profiteering. If Intel does not lie, then it is their technology research and development, it is not as good as SuperWei Semiconductor.

Here I would like to ask the representative of Intel, which one of my guesses is correct? Or is there a third possibility, and both?

There are also those PC manufacturers who are constantly attacking the group, why, because their products are not as cost-effective as they are. Their 10,000-dollar laptop is worse than the 8,000 yuan.

They don't want to lower their selling prices, but instead ask the group to raise the price. Frankly speaking, even if the price of the group is raised, although the sales volume may be reduced, the profit of the single product has increased a lot, and even the group may earn more.

But we don't have such a choice. We have chosen to allow more consumers to buy computers at reasonable prices. We want to make computers an ordinary household product rather than a so-called high-end electronic product.

These are the words I want to say today, the conscience of a conscience entrepreneur!

... (to be continued.)