Latest website: Generally speaking, Professor Boblon’s speech was very successful. Of course, if Joseph's speech was reviewed first, he might add something like "I stepped out of the door with my front foot today, but I don’t plan to step forward again. "This door" or something.

After this memorial service, the relationship between the North and the South became more and more antagonistic. In the past, in the northern public opinion, what criticized the so-called "inferiority of pirate culture" was actually not the mainstream view in the northern newspapers. On the contrary, there were not many media that opposed this view. Public opinion actually regards this view as nonsense, and regards the people who put forward this view, such as Narrative Fnir, such as Gred, as grandstanding clowns.

But after this series of things, the original clowns who were sensationalists became fighters and martyrs, and theories that were originally regarded as nonsense have subsequently become serious, in-depth, worthy of study, and even It is a theory worth learning.

The academic world, especially the social sciences, is very different from the natural sciences. One of the big differences is that the experimental cost of social science is too high and the experiment is too difficult.

For one thing, if there is a dispute in the natural sciences, what should we do? It's very simple. You design one or several experiments, and then verify it. Then it becomes clear who is right and who is wrong. No matter how you can debate, no matter how high your status is, even if you have the title of Great Arcanist, an experiment will explode your head.

But social science has no such conditions. Different social opinions are difficult to verify through experiments. This is because the cost is too high. For example, if you come up with a claim that democracy is better than monarchy, to experiment, a revolution must occur. This cost is much higher than creating a gap in a piece of paper. If the experiment fails, the price paid is often staggering.

Of course, if an experiment can be passed, just like natural science, the dispute will be completely resolved and the winner will be distinguished, even if the cost is a little higher, it is not completely unacceptable. But the problem is that these social science experiments are difficult to rule out interference from other factors. Therefore, even if a certain result appears in an experiment and supports a certain hypothesis, the opponents of this hypothesis will still be because there are too many in the experiment. The disturbing factors cannot control the variables and believe that the results of this experiment cannot explain that their claims are wrong.

The course of history also proves this to a certain extent. For example, in the original history, the French Revolution finally failed, and the Bourbon dynasty was restored under the protection of the bayonets of European monarchies. At that time, it seemed that the republic The experiment seems to have been proven wrong, and the monarchy is the choice that conforms to the social sciences. From then on until the First World War, the most powerful country in the world was still a monarchy. Even after a great war, Er Dezi was finished, and the status of the United States rose greatly. Because of the existence of Britain, the mainstream The view was still that the monarchy was the best, but that the constitutional monarchy was better than the monarchy.

By the same token, after the disintegration of Teddy Bear, many people felt that TG Doctrine had completely failed, and even thought that history had ended. However, it didn’t take long for them to discover that the New Crown Chuang Wang had rushed out of Shangluo Mountain. Look at the beacon everywhere. On the other hand, Jianzhou Jurchen rose rapidly... Suddenly, the world was once again facing a "big change unseen in a century".

Therefore, the social sciences can hardly use a straightforward experiment to obtain a reliable and irrefutable result. This also makes social theoretical debates, most of the time, actually about interests, or, to put it more clearly, the debate about where the **** is.

Many scholars, especially sociology scholars, have carefully studied the remarks of Professor Fafnell and Professor Grider, only to find that their set of theories is really in line with them. Benefits.

First of all, according to this theory, the American people are deeply affected by the "England pirate culture" and need to be cured spiritually and receive the influence of the excellent culture of the European continent in order to get rid of this "venomous snake that entangles their soul." .

But who can take on the important task of a nation's psychiatrist? There is no doubt that they are the only ones, the so-called "intellectual class". If this theory is widely accepted by the entire American people, then they will become the spiritual mentor of the entire United States. Then... the benefits in it, as long as you are not a fool, you can definitely see it.

Fundamentally speaking, common interests, and only common interests, can unite a large group of people. As a result, the faculty of philosophy, literature, and art in these universities in North America quickly united under the banner of "cleaning out the cultural heritage of pirates and bandits in England", except for one department, that is, law. The reason is also very simple, because in "cleaning out the cultural heritage of pirates in England", there is an important toxin, which is the law of the sea.

To liquidate the law of the sea system and replace it with a civil law system, this is tantamount to destroying the jobs of the law majors in all universities in the United States. Therefore, the law majors also unite with those who engage in philosophy and literature. There was a fight. This one can be regarded as a match for the opponent, and will meet Liangcai. Law-students are generally eloquent, and they can get the third point unreasonable. Whether it is resorting to logic or emotion, their level is not bad.

But there is one thing that really makes those who are in the legal profession very painful, and that is the disadvantage of the countries of the law of the sea relative to France.

Even if you talk about going up to the sky, you can't say: "Look at other people's France, it can develop so well because they practice civil law."

A country that is economically and militaryly strong must also be culturally strong. Because the aura of economic and military strength will reflect his culture particularly brightly. It was the Red Rabbit Kingdom that year, when facing the light of the lighthouse, it was once dazzled.

Therefore, in this confrontation, the American legal profession is naturally at a disadvantage. What's more, their enemies are not just those who study philosophy and literature. The French will naturally not let go of such an opportunity.

After discovering that he had directed the play, although the effect was very good, but finally let the people of the Ministry of Public Security take advantage of the opportunity, Lucien, who was rather depressed, was laughed at by his second brother. In order to regain the decline, at Polina's suggestion, Lucien put her down and went to her eldest brother Joseph for advice.

"Idiot, Lucien! You are so stupid!" Polina said, "Don't talk to Joseph about this kind of conspiracy and go to Napoleon? Napoleon sees you making a fool of yourself, and doesn't take the opportunity to ridicule you. Weird!"

"But go to Joseph, wouldn't he be sarcastic?" Lucien said bitterly.

"So you are an idiot!" Polina said, "You won't find someone first, bribe, and let her help you clean up Joseph's favor?"

"She? Well, Pauline, Joseph has always been very nice to you, well, what bribe do you need to help me, just say it!" Lucien put on a pair of the ones I had laid on the cutting board. Posture.

"Fool! You are such a fool!" Polina said, "Well, you have a nice villa in Al."

"It's yours," Lucien said.

"Also, I think Lilith is very cute." Polina said again.

"This..." Lucien hesitated for a moment. "It depends on your ability."

"That's fine." Polina stretched out her tongue and licked her lips. "I'll teach you how to do it. Well, do you know what Alice likes best?"

"Ah," Lucien understood all of a sudden, "Polina, the ‘she’ you said refers to Alice?"

"Nonsense, now on Joseph's side, who is the best way to make him succumb, but Alice?" Polina said, "So, of course I have to find a way to bribe Alice!"

Having said that, he glanced at Lucien again, and keenly noticed a regretful expression on his face, he quickly added another sentence: "I warn you, you must not regret what you promised me, or else you You can try...hehe..."

"Man, how can you go back on what you say?" Lucien said, "What a condition is this. Besides, although Joseph...but Alice still likes you very much, I can prevent you from slandering. Well, by the way, how did you bribe Alice."

"I secretly brought her all kinds of delicious candies and ice cream."

"So? But...isn't it a problem? If Joseph knows, he will be angry~lightnovelpub.net~ If you don't say it, don't Alice, how can Joseph know?"

...

Lucien smugly called a few capable men over.

"We want to insert our people in the American legal profession!" Lucien said straightforwardly.

"The American legal profession is now quite opposed to us." A subordinate said.

"Of course I know this." Lucien said, "but it doesn't mean we can't win them over. They are in the United States now, and they are at a disadvantage. I don't believe that under such circumstances, there is no one who is willing to surrender first. After all. , Surrendering first can always get a lot of benefits. Moreover, their foreign trade business is mainly carried out with countries that implement civil law. So they themselves need talents who develop civil law. So if there is a school, some people When they started to study our law department, they were not worried about being out of food. Our influence in French universities far exceeds that of the Ministry of Public Security. We can encourage and help some American schools through friendly colleges and departments. Develop a high-level professional in the civil law system. Then...what is the Ministry of Public Security competing with us?"