What is the ghost that is not passed?

It’s not just that Luo Wenxuan and Lu Zhou’s students, Lu Zhou himself, can’t believe the content of this email.

After carefully reading Professor Faltins’ review comments, Lu Zhou generally understood what he meant.

According to Professor Faltins, he believes that there is a big controversy in some parts of the paper, which leads to serious proof defects in the core part of the paper. It is not enough to prove that when e is infinite, re(s)≥1-e There are no non-zero ordinary points of the ζ function in the region.

To be honest, Lu Zhou wrote this paper, and it was the first time he was called back to ask for rectification.

Standing behind Lu Zhou, I also saw the review comments from the beginning, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.

"Is there a problem?"

Lu Zhou shook his head: "It’s too early to make a decision, wait until I see it."

Hearing this sentence, He Changwen, sitting next to his ear and listening to it, almost did not turn his hand and flew out.

Yes.

Others have received a reply to the proposed rectification. The first reaction is to change the situation honestly. When will the reviewer be comfortable when it will be able to pass the manuscript, the big man will have to look at it again...

Thinking of this, He Changwen’s heart can’t help but feel a whole emotion.

It’s a big fight...

When is he so arrogant?

Did not notice what several of my students were thinking.

After finishing the sentence, Lu Zhou bent down and pulled out the printed version of the paper that had previously proved the Quasi-Riemann conjecture from the counter below the desk, in line with the position pointed out by Professor Faltins. I checked it in one line.

Because he couldn't understand the profound things of analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan stood so eagerly behind the Lu Zhou, pretending to be able to understand, and quietly waiting for the result of Lu Zhou.

In this way, it took about ten minutes to go.

Just as Luo Wenxuan and others began to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly slammed the paper in his hand and threw the stack of papers on the table.

Seeing that Lu Zhou had finished watching, Luo Wenxuan quickly asked curiously.

"How is the result?"

Lu Zhou shook his head.

"I don't think I have a problem writing."

Luo Wenxuan hesitated and asked: "So... is Professor Faltins wrong?"

When he said this, he had no confidence in his heart.

That was Professor Fartings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.

On the influence of mathematics, I am afraid it is a little bigger than my mentor, Edward Witten.

It’s just that the old gentleman’s temper is notorious. The popularity of the academic world is not as good as the Witten.

"It’s too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," stood up from the chair and paused for a moment. Lu Zhou continued, "I will communicate this question with Professor Faltins."

"I'm a little difficult to communicate with Professor Faltins... The things he has identified will not change basically, and..." Hesitantly, Luo Wenxuan still reminded him, "...if you can't convince him, I'm afraid. He will be ridiculed by him."

"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said, not paying much attention. "If he is right, I will correct it. If I am right, I will not change a symbol."

Luo Wenxuan asked: "If any of you can't convince anyone?"

This situation is quite common in the mathematics world. When the academic level of two people is almost the same, the right to speak in academic circles is extremely close. It is really difficult to convince anyone on some plausible issues.

After all, the deeper the research into the frontier, the more things are not as obvious as it seems. Sometimes for the same problem, two different schools have two different views, and they have been arguing for quite a long time, and this is also possible.

Of course, the charm of mathematics is also here.

No matter how much controversy exists, there has never been a dispute that can last forever. The right party will always stand out from the crowd. Even the three mathematical crises that have erupted in history have almost shaken the foundation of the entire mathematics building, but in the end people have found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.

"If anyone can't convince anyone..."

After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued to say nothing.

"Look at who we can convince others."

......

There is never a wall in this world that is impenetrable.

Especially on the edge of the wall, when a group of creatures keen on gossip.

On the evening of Lu Zhou’s receipt of the review of the Mathematics Yearbook, a major event occurred on mathoverflow.

Someone suddenly burst out, and Lu Zhou delivered the paper on the proof of "Quasi-Riemann conjecture" in the "Mathematical Yearly", which was called back by the reviewer Professor Faltins.

When the news came out, it suddenly ignited the topic of the entire forum. Almost as soon as the forum was opened, it was obvious that someone was discussing the matter enthusiastically.

[Professor Lu was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out to the west! 】

[I said that his proof is seriously flawed, and you all spray me. Now, not only do I think so alone, even Professor Faltins thinks so, do you spray it? Idiots! 】

[Just a rejection is actually very common? Even top scholars, it is inevitable that there will be some small flaws in the paper. 】

[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn't you see the screenshot? The wording of the rejection is not as simple as a small flaw, but "there is a major flaw in the core argument." Do you know what it means? Generally speaking, this sentence means that if you can't make a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you don't call back to let you rectify, but throw it directly into the trash! 】

[This is too unusual anyway...]

[Nothing unusual, after all, the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is notoriously uninformed, or he will not be able to mix in Princeton and go back to Germany to teach. This is too sinful, please allow me to be anonymous. 】

[...]

In fact, in a strict sense, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, the screenshots of the review comments are leaked out by which boring person.

After discovering this matter, the editorial department of Mathematical Yearbook immediately contacted the administrator of the mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the m forum also deleted the bulletin. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known by more than two people, it can't be called a secret.

What's more, the mathematics community is really too lacking in gossip, so that the small things of Sesame can cause heated discussion in the entire academic community.

Not to mention, it is the two large-scale cattle of Faltins and Lu Zhou. The focus of the debate is on Riemann’s conjecture of this nuclear-level problem...

The debate lasted for three days and neither of the two parties responded.

One is a forum that does not go to such a young scholar. As for the other person who has an account, it is probably the kind of person who does not bother to explain.

Just when the discussion continued to ferment, when people talked about the further action of Lu Zhou or Faltins, Jinling University, which has been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a heavy news on the official website.

The content of the message is short, but it is just a short word.

However, the amount of information in it is huge enough that almost everyone has not responded.

[On December 18th, our school will launch an academic report on the theme of “Quasi Riemann conjecture” in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life to prove the problems in the process. At present, the registration channel is open. Those who are interested in participating should submit the registration information before the deadline of December 7. 】

[Reporting Speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]

Almost on the day when this news was released...

The entire mathematics community suddenly boiled!