"I disagree with the Foreign Secretary's statement that the British Empire is the inventor and master of coercive diplomacy.

Under the leadership of you and your colleague, Europe's brilliant European offshore balancer, the situation in Europe has been at the helm of the United Kingdom for more than 100 years.

Over the years, the UK has demonstrated to the world textbook examples of coercive diplomacy through economic blockade and unilateral sanctions.

From 1830 to 1839, under the promotion and coercion of you and the Viscount Palmerston, don’t forget that the Kingdom of Belgium was poached from the Netherlands to establish a state, so we have the most say in the coercive diplomacy of the United Kingdom, The British approach is memorable"

wow!

The rising star of diplomacy in the Netherlands did not disappoint. He immediately countered the idea of ​​Foreign Secretary Russell's attack on the Netherlands just now. Good guy, he directly used the famous work of Viscount Palmerston, a British diplomat, to promote Belgium. Breaking away from the iron-clad fact of Dutch rule, to come and slap Russell in the face, it's really sharp, don't say it, people are speaking with facts.

Mike Davies ignored Russell's somewhat unhappy face and chased after the victory: "In order to interfere in Norway's affairs, the British Empire separated the northern European coastal area of ​​the UK, and to deal with the rule from Stockholm, even coerced the Swedish King Carl XV. The world demanded support for the Norwegians' desire to conduct more overseas transactions with the United Kingdom, and thus make the Norwegian government more independent of Swedish rule. In the end, it could only give up under the strong opposition of Stockholm.

I would like to ask the Foreign Secretary how to explain these shameful coercive acts by the British Empire? "

How to explain?

The reporter below quickly moved the pen in his hand, and quickly described the confrontation between the two just now. He used all the letters accurately. At the same time, the modified tone and the exaggeration of the news have always been used. Many people have already thought of a lot. title.

Luo Yin of the Austro-Hungarian "Crown": "Which is more coercive than the British and Dutch diplomatic confrontation?"

Merck, The New York Times of the Commonwealth of America: "The virtues of Europe, who are the great powers more contemptible?"

Rouxen, Le Figaro of the French Empire: "Who is worse? England or Holland?"

Sappho of Spanish Herald: "Should Spain join the 'coercion'?"

Other newspapers have followed their usual thinking in newspapers, and they have just written a merciless overview of the "blooming flowers" based on the wonderful beginning of the two.

The conversation between the two started a very surprising beginning to the newspaper reporters, and they all had more expectations for the next two people's moves.

Russell was also stunned by Mike Davis' counterattack, and then angry.

Is it true that our British Empire is easy to bully?

A good Dutch diplomat has just been so rude to him, the chief diplomat of British foreign affairs, at the home of the British Empire in London.

That being the case, the gentleman's words are meaningless.

British Foreign Secretary Russell then countered: "There are currently six major powers in Europe for the United Kingdom, France, Tsarist Russia, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman, and Prussia. challenges that are undermining the international order.

As a major country with many interests both at sea and on land, the UK will defend the international morality, the international peace structure agreement and the diplomatic principles of various countries based on these six major powers, in order to maintain world peace and security, and protect the UK and other countries in the world rights and interests, I hereby call on the Kingdom of the Netherlands to contribute more to peace in Europe and the world, not the other way around. "

Break the European order? Britain defended the order and therefore was willing to quarrel with the Netherlands?

Russell's statement made the reporters feel the excitement of a new world like a shark smelling blood.

What the British foreign secretary seems to be saying is that Britain is not ready to accept the Netherlands as the seventh largest country out of the six?

Even the meaning is so straightforward that it wants the Netherlands to give up its ambitions. Will the Netherlands agree?

Who are the reporters present? They are the trump cards of their respective newspapers. Their political sensitivity is not generally high, otherwise they would not have become the trump cards of their respective newspapers, so they quickly knew that this was Foreign Secretary Russell. A trap dug for Holland.

Despite this, they had to admit that Russell was worthy of being an old diplomat master. Although he was suppressed by the Viscount Palmerston before, no one would deny his status and means in the British diplomatic circle.

"Above the Sky"

Mike Davies retorted: "The truth of the matter is that the international order that the Foreign Secretary keeps talking about is actually an order that serves Britain's own interests and maintains its maritime hegemony.

Many people in Europe now question that the UK is the biggest source of chaos in Europe and even the world order, and Europe’s scumbag.”

The Dutch ambassador to the UK added: "The Netherlands was and will be the defender of the European order, and Foreign Secretary Russell should not forget that the Netherlands is the founder of many international alliances and we are also the leader of multilateral organizations.

The Netherlands created the International Labour Union to safeguard the rights and interests of the world's workers, while helping capital factories and workers to establish channels to reduce conflicts.

The Netherlands established the International Women's Alliance~lightnovelpub.net~ to reduce gender discrimination and claim rights for all women in the world,

The Netherlands also created the International Hague Tribunal, which provides the best and fairest tool for the world to rule the country by law and control international disputes in accordance with the law.

Just ask Your Excellency Russell, what is wrong with such a Netherlands compared to the British warships coercing diplomacy.

The Netherlands has always maintained an international system with these international institutions at its core, based on the international law of the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

These international organizations created by the Netherlands have been accepted and joined by various countries. I don't understand why the UK thinks that the Netherlands intends to undermine the international order. It is obvious that we are only strengthening the international order.

At present, the Netherlands has been recognized by many countries all over the world. The International Hague Tribunal was established in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Greece, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, the Commonwealth of America, All the countries in the country have joined. At present, the Ottoman Empire and others have submitted applications to join, so you may have misunderstood the Netherlands. The Netherlands is really the member that maintains the international order in the world.

On the contrary, the UK seems to be still taking the diplomatic route of independence and outside the big family of Europe. It seems to be too isolated and out of harmony with the world!

I suggest that the British Empire join the International Hague Tribunal, a world-class organization that is beyond the scope of Europe, because the UK's status as a world power is more representative in it, so that the UK can exert its international influence."

Mike Davis' suggestion made everyone stunned for a moment. He had never seen an opponent who thought so much for the enemy. Because of this, would the British believe in his kindness?

Russell, the foreign secretary of the British Empire, does not believe it. He has already begun to contemplate the "what intentions" of the Dutch ambassador in front of him.