Hollywood movies that have lost the profit intake of the entire industry chain face the rise of the television industry, which has led to a large loss of audiences.

There is also the 1950s when the economy is going up, people's income is getting higher and higher, and there are more and more entertainment methods, but they are unwilling to enter the cinema in the 1950s.

After only five or six years of support, 70% of all Hollywood companies have fallen into a state of loss.

Then in the 1960s, the black uncles first demanded and demanded power from all over the country.

Then there was the Vietnam-Male War, a large number of young people were sent to the jungle tens of thousands of kilometers away, and then there was the rise of the hippie movement.

Countless young people are either not in the U.S. or wandering all over the country. Not many people go to the cinema to watch movies.

In addition, TV sets are getting cheaper and cheaper, and the program has changed from 4 stations in the 1950s to 11 stations in the 1960s.

In an instant, the film industry didn't even have the ability to fight back, and was beaten to the ground.

Of course, not all of them are as miserable as Migao Enzyme.

It's not the management that really made this company go down, and it's not that it couldn't produce good movies.

But after the death of the helm, there was a dispute over the concept of filmmaking, which was to make blockbuster films and then to only make low-cost films.

There are serious differences in business philosophy. Migao Enzyme has been able to support it for 20 years before reaching the brink of bankruptcy. It can only be said that the company's background is indeed deep.

Of course, it will be like this, and it has something to do with their past too glorious.

In other words, if a company is always immersed in the past, it is difficult to accept the fact that it has fallen.

This situation is as effective as Paramount, who was not the first or second in comparison with Migao Enzyme.

It's just that Paramount can see the situation a few years faster than Migao Enzyme, or he is a little bit worse than Migao Enzyme.

It was too early to hold on, so that in the mid-1960s, it began to compromise with capital, and then it was acquired by the oil group of the Maple Leaf Country in order to enter the U.S. market.

In the past, the boss and the second child were both acquired, but the biggest difference between the two is that one of them was entrusted with a non-human being, and the other found a strong owner when he sold himself.

But don't look at Paramount, it seems that not many negative news broke out.

But they really met a good boss, but it was a pity that they had lost 20 years of bumping and bumping. Although they have produced many good movies, one big sales can't make up the loss of three movies.

So that the oil companies that lost money in the end couldn't hold on, and sold them back directly to the Americans.

The people who bought Migao Enzymes have the same purpose as the oil group of Maple Leaf Country, and they are all known as film companies.

However, the two companies' attitudes towards their respective film companies are compared, and the oil sellers are simply angels.

Corian's splitting of Migao Enzyme's film business and hotel business directly led to Migao Enzyme Pictures. In the next few decades, it has become a money tool for constantly changing owners and being repeatedly squeezed out of profits.

As for other companies in Hollywood.

In the future, one person's box office will be able to single-handedly single out other companies in Hollywood. At this time, they are still producing various cartoons for TV stations, and they are also digging into the profit potential of their own amusement parks.

Living comfortably without big money, small money keeps small days.

When Universal saw this, he also went to cooperate with TV stations and built a Universal Amusement Park, and finally reached out to the record industry.

As for Columbia and the fox, because they take the small and medium cost route, they don't earn much and lose little.

But once there was a box office bomb that saw a big tree with a knife, it would be enough for them to support it for a few more years.

The best time ever was Warner.

In the early 1950s, he put himself in the arms of the television industry altogether, treating film companies as content producers.

Not only did they survive the harsh winters of the American film industry in the 1950s and 60s, they even had the qualifications to quietly marry the Boston consortium.

It's a pity that this one can be like Warner.

The Vanity Fair, which was crazy for profit and drunken gold fans, landed on the ground in just 20 years.

This made the Americans who wanted to tie a chain to the lion, but did not expect to use too much force, and instead strangled their poodle to death, had to acquiesce in the fact that the anti-monopoly bill of the year was in name only.

With one eye open and one eye closed, the major Hollywood film companies, in the name of a subsidiary or holding company, successively set up distribution companies again.

But after so many years, if you want to regain the stable profit of the theater, not to mention that the Americans themselves dare not let it go.

The market has long been dominated by theater companies.

As long as you dare to come in, make sure that the theaters will unite against the film company.

Moreover, after the loss of the market, the rapid decrease in the number of employees will inevitably lead to a decrease in good movies.

In addition, it is the nature of capital to seek profit. If you don't make money, no one will care about you immediately.

Had it not been for the oil crisis, the U.S. economy had declined rapidly in the 1970s.

Unemployment, bankruptcy, and a substantial decrease in income have made American films, which are naturally profitable in the opposite direction of the economy, once again gaining a golden decade in which profits have soared.

The reason is very simple. When the Americans have no money, they will naturally try to minimize the costly entertainment.

Then in addition to fitness and outdoor sports, movies that cost 2 to 4 dollars have become the cheapest entertainment.

Then capital naturally began to favor its Hollywood ~ lightnovelpub.net ~. With a market and capital, talents themselves will go to this industry.

This strange economic model will be clearly and clearly reflected in the year-round box office growth when an economic crisis occurs in the future.

Li Changheng, who decided to abandon Migao enzymes and buy United American, once again asked for a copy of the folder from Robes.

Walk directly to the snack shop next to the on-site parking lot.

A dozen middle-aged westerners stood up immediately with different expressions.

Then all his eyes were shining, and he looked respectfully at the man who came by. Rumor has it that his net worth has exceeded 2 billion.

With the cash in hand, he can easily buy Migao Enzyme and Lianmei, and the distinguished and foresighted super bosses.

According to reports from the Washington media, Henry Lee actually finished making a movie by himself, and only bought 11 theaters in London and Hong Kong and Kowloon, after spending 50 million US dollars.

It shook the entire Hollywood in an instant.

The people of Migao enzymes collected the news in only two days, and the boss personally led the team. Half of the senior executives flew to London, hoping to talk with Li Changheng once to determine whether the news was true.

Then the people from Lianmei didn't have any surprises, and followed them to London.

"Who are from Lianmei?"

As soon as he said this, Lianmei's face immediately showed disappointment.

But before the people of Migao Enzyme were happy for a few seconds, Li Changheng said to the people of Lianmei, "The 45 million wholly-owned acquisition is okay, but I don't assume any debts.

If you feel that there is no problem, you can discuss a formal contract with my team of lawyers. "

Look at me from the United States people. I think you hesitated for a while before carefully asking, "SIR, what about the question of whether we people go or stay?"