A very convincing comment.

　　 I didn't want to issue a single chapter, but this one refused to answer directly.

　　 Mo Tu This reader has expressed a lot of opinions.

　　 First question, she searched for some information from Baidu, saying that the protagonist should not let Miyuki Matsushiro bear debts, and that she can rent a cold room without spending so much.

　　 I replied: The protagonist’s purpose is not just for the storage room. You all said that the price of the refrigerated room is not high, and the cost outside the storage room is higher. A more complete base that can accommodate more people and more power.

　　 I explained this, but he didn't listen.

　　 The second question, he began to popularize the value of the warehouse with me, saying that the protagonist gave one hundred thousand too much.

　　 I replied: What the protagonist gave to one hundred thousand was the price of the base, not the rental price of the remodeled warehouse. Isn't this different?

　　 Okay, I still don’t listen.

　　 The third question says that three hundred equals for the protagonist are enough.

　　 I replied: The problem is that it is not just these few people. It takes at least five years to ten years to develop, and there are many functions and facilities, and 300 square meters are not enough.

　　 Of course, he replied that 1,800 meters is enough, and calculated the price according to the warehouse.

　　 The problem is that the protagonist doesn't want to just want the warehouse, but he still doesn't listen.

　　 For the fourth question, Mo Tu again started to say that the protagonist made Songcheng Miyuki run the industry to disdain him.

　　 The problem is that the industry belongs to her, and the protagonist pays the money back, and the protagonist helps her get promoted. Why is this ridiculous? You get more, okay?

　　 Take what you need, and you can bear the consequences, on the contrary, the protagonist is more dangerous.

　　 Why don't you feel disgusted?

　　 Up to this point, the reader did not answer positively, and said that I could not accept criticism, so he left.

　　 Next, I replied to several articles, one of which was wrong. I said that the rent for five years is not enough. Here is my mistake.

　　 As a result, the reader has already stated that he has left and is back here, mocking me for this point, and replying to several articles.

　　 I admit the mistake here, but it is not important.

　　The protagonist does not want to renovate the warehouse. He has already planned to change it in a year. Now someone provides it, why can't it be done in one step?

　　 Everything you have is based on the value equivalence between the remodeled warehouse and the base. The problem is not equivalence.

　　 Everything you have is based on the protagonist who only needs the refrigerated room, but the problem is that what the protagonist needs is to transform the base.

　　 There are some of these articles. I have put forward four or five times in the process of rebutting, but I can't get a positive answer.

　　 I don’t understand, can’t you answer my other questions directly?

　　 I made so many mistakes, I explained so much, but I didn’t answer directly, I found a mistake, and I can come back after I leave.

　　 is gone now, anyway, he just doesn't answer directly.