You must know that it is the Su-30MKK fighter-bomber, the only one in the world that can be as famous as the American F-15E fighter-bomber, and even the US military has a high evaluation of this model.

　　 The result is such a world-renowned super-powerful model. In the two main aviation officers, they follow the broken sacks discarded by their will. Whoever wants it, who wants it, anyway, they don't want it.

　　 What does this mean?

　　 The performance of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber is no less than that of the Russian Su-30MKK fighter-bomber, and it even surpasses a lot in some aspects.

　　 In fact, this is indeed the case. If not, why should the chief officers of the two aviation units put their faces aside, and in front of so many people, they said that they should grab the FBC-1A fighter-bomber for whatever reason?

　　 Haven't the two of them passed this strategic air defense exercise and saw that the FBC-1A fighter-bomber is extraordinary.

As the so-called layman is watching the excitement and the expert watching the doorway, how the air defense unit leaders view the FBC-1A fighter-bomber is also from the perspective of the air defense force. It is not that he does not want to look at the FBC-1A fighter-bomber more comprehensively. It is his own expertise and limitations that make it difficult for him to obtain a comprehensive perspective.

The chief officers of the two aviation units are different. After seeing the FBC-1A fighter-bomber adopting the attack panther mode and carrying the real-time image of the DZB-1500 stealth air-launched cruise missile attack, the two have been sturdy by the FBC-1A fighter-bomber. His posture and powerful ground attack are deeply attracted.

As a result, for a long time afterwards, the two of them did not have much communication with other cadres and leaders of the troops who participated in the observation, because they were watching, evaluating, and measuring what role the FBC-1A fighter-bomber can play in their own troops. ; What kind of capabilities are available in the critical southeast coastal military struggle; snowy areas and border areas; then there are a series of issues such as training, logistics, and maintenance.

　　 finally came to the conclusion that the FBC-1A fighter-bomber is not necessarily the best fighter-bomber in the world, but it is definitely the most suitable fighter-bomber for the actual domestic situation.

　　 One strip alone is enough for the two to fight for the head. What's more, the FBC-1A fighter-bomber also uses some of the advanced technologies of the next-generation combat aircraft in the stealth panther mode.

　　 Yes, the FBC-1A fighter-bomber in stealth panther mode does indeed apply a key technology of the next generation of combat aircraft, that is, the body bomb bay.

It stands to reason that with the aerodynamic shape and comprehensive structure of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber, there is no way to make a bomb bay. Unless the FBC-1A fighter-bomber is overthrown, the aerodynamic shape, mechanical structure and various systems can be redesigned. The bomb bay was barely loaded in.

The problem is that doing so is no different from redesigning a brand new combat aircraft. Not only is it time-consuming and labor-intensive, but the development cycle will also be very long. More importantly, it will be very cost-effective and will naturally not become the first choice. .

　　 Since it is not to change the structure of the airframe, how does the FBC-1A fighter-bomber achieve the magical ability of the airframe bomb bay?

　　 That's because Ascendas Group introduced a concept called "conformity tactical cabin".

　　 Of course, the concept of this "conformal tactical cabin" sounds a bit unclear. In fact, the basis of this concept is actually the conformal fuel tank tailored by Ascendas Group for the FBC-1A fighter-bomber.

After all, even the strong 5H Tengfei Group of the Hongtong Factory has tried to tailor a conformal fuel tank for the back of the aircraft, thereby greatly increasing the combat radius of the strong 5 fighter; naturally, it is not possible to favor the other, and put Northwest Airlines in the same industry alliance. Leave the FBC-1A fighter-bomber project in the factory.

　　 So he also helped the FBC-1A fighter-bombers to build a set.

It’s just that the FBC-1A fighter-bomber has a different aerodynamic layout from the strong 5H, and the chief division of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber requested to improve the ultra-low-altitude penetration capability of this model, especially the supersonic low-altitude fast penetration. Can last 5 to 10 minutes.

　　 This index is easy to achieve for the next-generation combat aircraft, but for a fighter-bomber that uses many second-generation aircraft technologies and has just touched the threshold of the third-generation aircraft, it is obviously a bit ridiculously high.

The problem is that the FBC-1A fighter-bomber chief has set such a high index. Ascendas Group can’t blame anyone. Who made Ascendas Group, which wants to make money in the engine field, wants to make money and is crazy with the new WD-62SUV mid-thrust engine with a thrust-to-weight ratio of 8. Immediately afterwards, for various reasons, the supply of parts for the WD-62SM turbofan engine was reduced.

　　 The engine production company affiliated to Northwest Aviation Plant, which obtained the engine production technology and full set of technology, was fishing for three days and drying the net for two days, which could not meet the engine supply of FBC-1A fighter bombers after mass production.

　　 The engine manufacturing companies affiliated to the Northwest Aviation Plant have never thought about fighting. Is the question useful? The core engine is produced by Ascendas Group. Their Northwest plant does not have the production technology at all. If you dare to fight, Ascendas Group dares to cut off the core engine. Anyway, Ascendas Group Aero Engine Co., Ltd. has more products, so why give it? Your Northwest Plant produces core machines?

　　 Is it not fragrant to produce WD-58L turbofan engines for Bombardier's Chinese assembly plant?

　　 Even if it does not produce aero engines for aviation companies, the order for gas turbines of Ascendas Group is also hot. Is it reasonable to switch to production and let customers not wait too long?

　　 In short, there are too many reasons for Ascendas Group to not produce supporting core machines. It does not need to be too horizontal. A nice receptionist's polite phone explanation is enough.

　　 This is the so-called aero engine hegemony.

Ascendas Group has never allowed Northwest Aviation Plant, the leading unit of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber, to use its own WD-62SUV new medium-thrust engine. However, Dang Zhuang Jianye made adjustments to the production of aviation accessories and invited the FBC-1A fighter-bomber chief division. After the core of a group of research teams visited the WD-62SUV new medium-thrust engine ground vehicle ~lightnovelpub.net~ the fighter bomber project team decisively abandoned its own WD-62SM turbofan engine and chose the WD-62SUV.

　　 Now that there is a better engine, the comprehensive index of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber must be improved. Otherwise, why change the engine?

　　 WD-62SM turbofan engine is also good to make do with it?

　　 So the chief of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber said that it was retaliating for the aero-engine hegemony of the Ascendas Group, or deliberately embarrassing the Ascension Group.

Anyway, the FBC-1A fighter-bomber with the new medium-thrust engine of the WD-62SUV has a maximum take-off weight of 30.2 tons without carrying any traditional auxiliary fuel tanks. With 8 tons of standard ammunition, it must have a combat range of more than 2,800 kilometers. radius.

　　 Ultra-low-altitude penetration must also have a combat radius of more than 1,800 kilometers, and be able to conduct a low-altitude supersonic penetration for 5 to 10 minutes at a critical moment.

In this way, if the strong 5H back conformal fuel tank is obviously not suitable for the FBC-1A fighter-bomber, the engineers of Ascendas Group took a different approach and adopted a type that fits the external structure of the intake ducts on both sides of the FBC-1A fighter-bomber. The streamlined conformal fuel tank design perfectly solves the problem.

　　

　　Https://

　　 Only one second to remember the address of this site:. Mobile version reading URL: