"The plot itself of'Gravity', like'Avatar', does not have much room for discussion. It is even more concise and straightforward than'Avatar'. It simply tells a story of being trapped in space. After the desperate situation, I unrelentingly searched for the difficult journey of self-help. That's all.

This kind of story is not the first and definitely not the last in Hollywood history. In order to avoid spoilers, I gave up the elaboration and left it to the audience to watch it in the cinema. But relying on the framework of such a simple story, "Gravity" explores and presents philosophical issues far more brilliantly and more profoundly than "Avatar".

The crises and climaxes in the process of self-rescue are absolutely essential elements of commercial movies, but it is precisely in this seemingly unrelated story box that Alfonso has done a deep artistic discussion. At the same time, it will not affect the narrative rhythm of the script itself——

Every detail, every picture, every foreshadowing, and every performance all reveal powerful and profound philosophical implications, layered on top of each other in every aspect of the film; and in Remley-Hall With Rooney Mara's wonderful interpretation, it was released without reservation.

The film presents the process of life from birth to evolution, which is long and great, magnificent and mysterious, beautiful and moving; at the same time, it also proposes a more profound theme:

What is the meaning of existence?

This is the ultimate torture in the field of philosophy, who am I? Where did it come from? Where to go?

Freud could not answer, that is because everyone has a different understanding and insight; Alfonso-Caron also failed to answer, but penetrated his own understanding into the film, let everyone The audience felt their own things after watching the movie.

In the ending of "The Dark Knight", Nolan puts forward a core reflection: Are darkness and light really incompatible opposites? Or two sides that blend in with each other? Does justice still exist after the loss of evil? Do pure evil and pure justice exist objectively?

Now through'gravity', Caron puts forward another existentialist problem that is more profound, essential, and insoluble:

Does life have the meaning of existence because of fetters, or does it breed fetters because of existence? Should life maintain the fetters and chase the return of the soul, or should one cut the fetters and pursue the upgrade of higher ideas? How is the essence of life defined?

In the final analysis, this is a survival story, but it tells more about why it is required to survive.

As for how to think in this way, every audience will find their own answer.

The seemingly large, magnificent, complex and profound motifs are all perfectly dissolved in the control of the ups and downs of the commercial film shell. Caron used local film technology to create an incredible, unrepeatable and unsurpassable view. Shadow experience-at least for now.

The complementation between the picture and the light and shadow, the space and the composition, the role and the plot, the lens and the philosophical thinking, etc., has formed a responsive intertextuality, which truly fully displays the charm of film art, just like Martin-Scosi Sri Lanka's "Hugo" is general, presenting a film world constructed by film and light and shadow. This is something Christopher Nolan failed to do.

There is no doubt that this is a perfect work! Impeccable! "

As one of the top and most authoritative professional magazines in the industry, the "Hollywood Reporter" not only has a high position in the United States, but also in Europe, although the French "Cinema Manual" has repeatedly complained about the "Hollywood Reporter" too. Business is too popular, but every year the top ten choices of the two magazines flow between the editorial offices, not to help each other, but to understand each other.

Michael Phillips almost exhausted all the words of praise, and sent "gravity" to the throne of full marks!

But for the audience belonging to Michael, this does not seem to be a surprise, because at the Cannes Film Festival in May, Michael has already given a full score for "Drunk Country Folk Songs"!

In fact, just halfway through 2013, Michael already thought that "Drunk Country Folk Song" was the number one seed of the year, and now "gravity" has turned out again, which also put Michael in a dilemma.

Michael couldn't help but think of the famous Roger Ebert.

The two film critics are close friends.

In January 2005, Michael severely criticized the comedy movie "Han Zhi Wu / Male 2", "I hate this work, hate every minute and every second of this work, those who are self-righteous, stupid, smirking, blank At all times, the arrogance that anyone would like this work is disgusting. I hate it to fool the audience because it believes it can entertain the audience."

At that time, Rob-Schneider, the comedian who was responsible for the screenwriting and starring in this work, spoke ruthlessly and insulted Michael with ugly and dirty vocabulary. He even thought that Michael was not qualified to be a film critic, let alone qualified. Comment on his work because "he has never won a Pulitzer Prize."

After hearing such news, Roger came forward, "As a Pulitzer winner, then I should be eligible to comment. I must admit: Rob Schneider, your movie is disgusting and makes People have nausea."

This is a small episode, but it has become an opportunity for Roger and Michael to make friends.

Although Roger is the only film critic in the entire history of film critics who has won the Pulitzer Prize, Roger has never boasted. He is keen on getting acquainted with other colleagues, and met Michael by chance. Two people She became a great friend, and often talked about wine and joy at the film festival.

In fact, the viewing tastes of the two film critics’ friends are quite different. The most typical example is "Citizen Kane". This film is the best in Roger’s personal film history, but Michael thinks Orson Wells Too much praise, this work may be among the top 20 best in film history, but it is definitely not the best choice.

Conversely, Michael's personal film history is the best in "2001: A Space Odyssey", but Roger complained that it was a "too commercial" choice.

However, these so-called differences make them even more cherish each other's friendship:

If all film critics have the same taste, then it is the beginning of the demise of art. The existence of disputes and differences is the core essence of artistic disputes, and it is also an important driving force for urging artists to continue to create genres and make rapid development. There are differences, but they all make sense and cannot convince each other. This also means that the other side's point of view will become a new perspective for me to review the work.

Of course, Michael and Roger also have a lot of the same evil tastes. For example, both of them hate the well-recognized and popular "Die Hard 2", but they both have an admiration for the collapsed "Future Water World". Individuals especially like the boldness revealed by that crude plasma movie.

In addition, in recent years, Lanly's strong rise, they also hold a similar view:

This new-generation actor with outstanding talent is undoubtedly spiritual, and his focus and dedication are also admirable. The only worry is whether Renly can persist in the exploration of acting skills and break through himself after he became famous in his youth. They are all looking forward to the future of Lanly, "Maybe it can surpass Hanks."

The acting talents of actors such as Daniel Day-Lewis, Sean Penn, Meryl Streep, Catherine Hepburn, etc. are unquestionable, but they don’t have much interest in commercial box office and they don’t have much ability.

The audience appeal of actors such as Harrison Ford, Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Robert Downey Jr. is an important talent. Their charm in the box office market is indeed impressive, but the acting and artistic aspects are discussed. And delving into it is unsatisfactory.

Tom Hanks is the only pinnacle star with both box office and acting skills. Johnny Depp once had the opportunity to replicate Hanks's glory, but his image constraints and life problems have become a fatal shackle.

Now, it's Lan Li's turn.

Many similarities have made Roger and Michael close friends~lightnovelpub.net~ This is also a rare friendship.

In April of this year, Roger Ebert's cancer recurred. After 11 years of long struggle, he still failed to survive the torture of the disease, and finally died on April 4th.

Before Roger's death, Michael once went to the hospital to visit this old friend, and Roger's biggest regret at the time was that his physical condition might not be able to go to France to attend the Cannes Film Festival. Later, it was true. Roger left his beloved movie completely before the opening of Cannes.

Therefore, when watching "Drunk Country Folk Songs" at the Cannes Film Festival, Michael was in tears. That movie reminded him again of the old guy who dedicated all his life's enthusiasm to the movie, and also reminded him again of the old guy who was lying on the hospital bed but still remembering movies.

In the film review written for "Drunk Country Folk Songs" at the time, Michael said, "Do you still remember the beginning of life? Missing the folk songs means that you missed your life?"

For them, if they miss a movie, they also miss life. Their long life was condensed in that piece of movie screen, and also condensed in the confusion and hesitation of Levine Davis. Even now, recalling that movie, Michael still tears in his eyes.

Now, after watching "Gravity", Michael thinks of Roger again. Because of Roger’s appreciation for Renly, the young actor has dedicated two pinnacle works in just one year. They saw the hope for the future; and because of Roger's sincerity and love for the film, everything was condensed in Caron's lens!

Movies are irreplaceable for them after all.

Genius remembers this site address in one second: Mobile version Reading URL: