Renly Hall has won the best actor nomination for five consecutive years in making history, and he deserves to be the first person in history. Although the number of awards still stays at one time, it is like Meryl Streep, which also proves Since Lanly can consistently and excellently output top performances of wonderful works, the label of "acting" has become a part of Lanly's image, which is enough to illustrate the success of Lanly's career.

Even Jack Nicholson and Meryl Streep, even Marlon Brando and Al Pacino, even Catherine Hepburn and Daniel Day Lewis, they have not been able to reach this height. , Has not been able to create such a feat, and Lan Li still wrote such a record before he was thirty years old, adding a legendary color to this miraculous journey, and the future has unlimited possibilities.

This year, Meryl broke his own record with the "Magic Black Forest" and won the Oscar nomination for the nineteenth time. Now people can't help but start to speculate whether Lanly can become the next Meryl? Of course, Renly’s first step is to surpass the record of Jack Nicholson’s twelve Oscar nominations. Even with consecutive nominations, it will take him seven years to make history.

Seven years.

Waiting in front of Lan Li is still a long and legendary road. At his young age, there are countless unknown things waiting to be challenged.

Although the controversy caused by Bradley Cooper's winning the nomination for three consecutive years has overshadowed Renly’s history of making history, Don Quixote still silently sent blessings and prayed for Renly’s Oscar journey, looking forward to it. The blue ceremony can continue to make history at the Oscars.

Not long ago, the authoritative professional magazine "Variety" in the film industry launched a new year special issue. It counted and selected the top ten best performances in 2014. It does not distinguish between actors and actresses, but purely based on performance, objective reviews and rankings—— Only represents the exclusive position of the magazine.

First place, Lan Li-Hall, "Burst Drummer".

"Variety" magazine stated in a comment, "From the look to the smile to the action, Lanly-Hall truly gives a rich sense of layers in the process of artistic pursuit. A screen image that cannot be surpassed was created, and it truly gave art a living soul. There is no doubt that this is one of the best performances since the millennium."

Second place, Timothy-Spall, "Mr. Turner".

British actor Timothy Spoel’s most well-known role is undoubtedly the petty star Peter in the "Harry Potter" series, and he himself is a very senior and excellent actor in the UK. This year, he is directed by Mike Lee. "Mr. Turner", the actor who has won the Cannes Film Festival, has received numerous praises for his performance, and the industry has exclaimed again and again, giving him the highest evaluation.

But in the final awards season, they were regrettably ignored. In the final analysis, Mike Lee and Timothy Spoel are not good at social promotion. In addition, the North American publishing company Sony Classic did not spend much energy, which made the two of them. The big names in the industry have unfortunately missed the Oscar nomination.

After the nomination list came out, Timothy Spoel even surpassed Jennifer Aniston, and is considered the biggest bead of this year's Oscar nomination stage.

Third place, Jack Gyllenhaal, "Nightcrawler".

Fourth place, Julianne Moore, "Still Alice."

Fifth place, jk-simmons, "burst drummer".

It can be seen from this list that "Variety" magazine is still based in Hollywood in the final analysis, and many outstanding performances of European films have not been included, but I have to admit that this list can still give a glimpse of performances throughout the year. A microcosm; even in other lists, the names of these actors often appear.

"Empire" magazine also made a similar statistic, but the actors and actresses were counted separately, and Lanly reached the top again, and Timothy again followed closely behind.

There are also authoritative media such as "The New York Times" and "Hollywood Reporter". You can see both Renly and Timothy in the relevant lists. Even in the "Cinema Manual", Timothy The ranking also surpassed Lan Li, ranking the last in English performances, and Lan Li can only be ranked second.

It is precisely because of this that Timothy Spoel failed to win the nomination, which caused countless grievances. Even if Ralph Fiennes has not been able to win the Oscar nomination for the third time with the "Budapest Hotel", this is a pity, but it still lacks a little weight compared to Timothy Spoel.

But no matter what, this is the final result. The award season is like this. Some people are happy and some are worried. Although it is said that nomination depends on strength and winning depends on luck, even in the nomination stage, the era of "wine fragrance is not afraid of deep alleys" is gone. Returning, this year to see Marion Cotillard's counterattack shortlisted is already a windfall. In the end, the attention must fall on the nominees, because the award will be born among them.

From the overall situation of the works, the "Budapest Hotel" and "Boyhood" are leading the way, while "Burst Drummer" and "Birdman" are on the rise.

From the personal situation of the director and the actors, the director department should be the duel between Alessandro Gonzalez Inarito and Richard Linklater. The supporting role department lacks surprise changes, while the protagonist department The situation is initially clear-

The heroine should be the duel between Julianne Moore and Rosamund Pike, but Marion Cotillard and Reese Witherspoon should not be underestimated.

Marion in 2007 and Reese in 2005. Both actors defeated the biggest hot candidate to reach the top of the film without being optimistic. Among them, Marion defeated Julie Christie of "The Willow Shadow" ( Julie-christie), Reese defeated Felicity-Huffan (felicity-huffan) of "Across America". It is still an Oscar case. Who can be sure that it will not happen again this year?

The actor's competition should be between Eddie Medline, Michael Keaton and Renly Hall, but no one can ignore Bradley Cooper, but Jack Gyllenhaal. It should be considered that "getting a name is victory."

Bradley was able to rely on the overall strength of the work to enter the acting battle for three consecutive years when his performance was relatively weak. This in itself suffices to show that he has rich experience in the college public relations level; moreover, the charming and proactive cloth Ledley, he is bound to look forward to his breakthrough, not only satisfied with the nomination, but also hopes to win the award for the first time, which also makes him an uncertain factor in the second stage.

But on the whole, the competition should still revolve around Eddie, Keaton, and Renly. In particular, the works of the three actors have all entered the battle for the best picture, including the slightly less competitive "All Things". Theory", it can beat "Fox Hunter" and win the best picture nomination, which means that the academy judges' attitude towards this work is positive, so the second stage will contain more possibilities.

The three competitors have their own advantages and disadvantages, and it is difficult to draw a clear context from paper analysis. The intensity of competition is truly the highest in a decade.

In terms of strength, Lan Li is the first, Keaton is the second, and Eddie is the last. Obviously, all the professional praise is concentrated on Lan Li. Even if Eddie plays Stephen Hawking’s super difficult role, he has received countless praises. He vividly simulates the appearance of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, but he still hasn’t been able to. Beyond the blue gift.

The "Hollywood Reporter" commented so objectively

"Eddie Redmayne's exquisite and true interpretation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis allows the audience to empathize. It truly shows the actor's harshness and refinement of the performance details, but the more similar the physical level, the more the spirit will be highlighted. The thinness of the level. On the one hand, it stems from the limitation of the drama's focus on love, and the'Theory of Everything' does not really show the flesh and blood of the character Hawking; on the other hand, it stems from the fact that Redmayne's attention is completely lost On the other hand, it lacks the possibility of spiritual exploration. This is an excellent imitation but not a lively performance."

Although the "Hollywood Reporter" comments are almost ruthless, it basically represents the mainstream view of the film critics. Eddie's performance is very hard and hard, but the performance is only at the performance level after all-that is, imitation, body language However, the perfect simulation of, more and more highlights the thinness of the characters, which is far from being truly a character. From this point, Renly and Keaton easily exploded Eddie.

Also in the biographical performance, "Mr. Turner" Timothy Spoel is the highest level this year.

Of course, the real focus of the college’s public relations has never been the "professional level" that the film critics have been paying attention to. It is more of an impact. Eddie's performance can create a more powerful impact from the "visual level", which is more important. It is good for the impact of awards, because the naked eye can see that the actors are "working hard". On the contrary, it is the introverted and deep performances such as Renly and Keaton, and the public relations promotion is not easy to open the situation.

So ~lightnovelpub.net~ From the perspective of strong publicity, Eddie is the first, Renly is the second, Keaton is the last. After all, "Blasting Drummer" still creates a direct impact with physical pain, rising from physical pain to spiritual shock, which is also the most admired part of film critics.

From the perspective of the subject matter of the work, "The Theory of Everything" is a biographical, and a typical inspirational type of physically disabled people; while "Birdman" and "Burst Drummer" are both pseudo-biographies, and full of self-entertainment and self-deprecating effects, "Bird The ending of "Human" is sharper, while the ending of "Burst Drummer" is darker. In the end, the "Theory of Everything" ranked first, the "Birdman" followed, and the "Burst Drummer" came in the bottom.

From the point of view of credit and seniority, Keaton is the first, Renly is the second, and Eddie is the last. All credit and guilt votes should be concentrated on Keaton, which also makes him the biggest uncertainty factor in the troika. Next, we still need to see the second stage of the public relations operation of Fox Searchlight.

From the perspective of college public relations, Eddie is the first, Keaton is second, and Lan Li is the last.

Now there is still a month and a half before Oscar, everything is possible. Next is the time for the Eight Immortals to cross the sea and show their magical powers.

.