"Independent Telegraph", 60 minutes, "Colin Trevoro, like most genre film directors, they can find the lowest bottom line of commercial films, but when trying to a higher level, But always lose myself between stupidity and serious balance control."

"Daily News", 60 minutes, "It could have been worse, but thank God, Lanly-Hall saved this work; unfortunately, Lanly also failed to get rid of the panic and fear of dinosaur chasing. The final product of the film can barely be regarded as reaching the passing line."

"Vanity Fair", 60 minutes, "The movie is interesting enough to attract the audience to keep the attention to the end; but after watching the movie, you can realize that the content and depth of the script are far from enough. The problem is not that Whether dinosaurs are fresh and vivid, it is not enough to rely solely on dinosaurs. The only correct choice is the appearance of Renly Hall. His existence makes the movie more possible. I am willing to enter the sequel movie theater for him-provided that, He can still appear on the cast list during the sequel."

"Washington Post", 60 minutes, "It's hard to distinguish whether'Jurassic World' wants to be popcorn-style junk food or wants to go further. Colin Trevoro tried to connotate the theme When more attempts are made at the level, the problem is that he seems to want to try too many things."

"Chicago Sun", 60 minutes, "Of every three Americans, there must be one person who is willing to go into the cinema to watch this'Jurassic World'. They can find exactly what they expect to see, no More, not a lot. Unfortunately, the "not much" part is disappointing. This is a Lanly-Hall movie, and we look forward to seeing more, in addition to his performance, but also There are more valuable things."

"Los Angeles Times", 60 minutes, "'Jurassic World' looks like a big hit production, it has all the elements of a movie to detonate the box office market, seriousness and humor, characters and stories, of course, also There is a popcorn-like excitement, everything is smashed together in a blender; but can the mixture of these fragments really keep the audience looking forward? Lanly-Hall is still the best part of the movie, But that's all there is to it."

After a rough sweep, it is not difficult to find that there are not a few media outlets that give middle reviews, and many of them are authoritative figures such as the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Sun.

There is a little similarity between various viewpoints, but the rich and complex core has not been able to be discussed further, which ultimately makes the film stay at a level that is not high, no more, no more, sometimes, it means balance; And sometimes, this means the golden mean-obviously, the "Jurassic World" belongs to the latter.

When Lan Li got the script, he put forward a similar point: the script was too ambitious, many branches were scattered, and there were too many issues trying to discuss, but all of them were just superficial, not going deep, which also made Those thinking staying in a state of lukewarmness, on the contrary, may cause distraction of the audience.

Later, the script was adjusted according to Lan Li's ideas, and the relationship between Irving and Blair was used as a dark line, and related thinking about the use of dinosaurs as weapons of war was connected in series. The whole story appeared to be much concise and concise; but from the perspective of the finished product, Colin Trevoro was still not willing to give up the paving of the branch lines, which also caused the theme of the film to be slightly complicated, which affected the viewing experience.

Naturally, this became the focus of the critics' attack.

But Andy thought it was very interesting.

In the first place, when Lan Li took over the script, he raised relevant opinions and raised concerns about the quality of the finished film; and the current media reaction just confirms Lan Li’s evaluation, which once again proves Lan Li’s unique interpretation of the script. .

Secondly, if you look carefully at the content of the negative reviews and the middle reviews, it is not difficult to find that the negative reviews mainly focus on the scheduling and control of the entire movie. This is also the most important part of commercial popcorn movies. If you can’t catch the audience’s attention So everything is in vain; while the review is mainly focused on the interpretation and expression of the core, this is the key to the commercial film from the passing level to the level of excellence, the audience is not only a stimulus, but also looking forward to being able to Get more experience.

"Titanic" and "Avatar" can create miracles in movie history. It is definitely not that simple. It is more of an inevitable accident. The box office victory of "Avengers" is another type. Obviously, I am looking forward to the "Jurassic World" can bring more things.

So, can "Jurassic World" bring more?

This question depends on the opinions of the well-received media-bad reviews determine the lower limit, and good reviews determine the upper limit, and the reputation of commercial films is here.

"Empire", 95 points, "'Jurassic World' is a pure, silly, popcorn comedy with the joy of hitting the wall. When you enter the venue and receive the 3D glasses, you can temporarily store your brain in Baggage area, and then take it back when you leave. The entertainment effect is comparable to the "Avengers" three years ago, and what is even more commendable is that the charm of Lanly-Hall is enough to make up for the number advantage of the first six-person Avengers. ."

"Hollywood Report", 90 minutes, "If Trevor has completed an excellent job, every link is correct, and the admirable rhythm control runs through; through the big screen of the movie, you can feel Trevor If you try to pay tribute to Spielberg’s eager desire for the 1993 work that turned out to be born, and he succeeded. The most beautiful part is undoubtedly the overall scheduling of the climax. The audience will not forget the excitement of the dinosaur duel. Li-Hall’s important presence."

"New York Times", 90 minutes, "'Jurassic World' is a work desperately needed this summer. It is not an esoteric work such as'Interstellar' or'Gravity', nor does it present any new ideas. Content; but when all the conflicts come together, they collide with precious sparks. The full burst of adrenaline can make the audience appreciate the thrill of blood and violence, and the accurate performance of the actors is also a highlight."

"Variety Show", eighty-eight points, "Undoubtedly, this work has inherited the many advantages of Spielberg's version of Jurassic Park: rich imagination, thrilling sense of horror, and a trace of reflection on humans themselves, and After processing from a new perspective in the 21st century, a bucket of creamy popcorn is presented. Is it perfect? ​​Of course not; is it worth going into a movie theater? A hundred willing."

"The New Yorker", eighty-five points, "No matter how you plan to evaluate Jurassic World, the brilliant visual effects of this movie are enough to maintain a high degree of attention in the movie, allowing the audience to escape from real life for a short time and enter My imagination of the unknown and eclipsed those films lacking fantasy and dreams. And the most exciting part is that it can awaken our love and enthusiasm for movie magic, which is enough to prove many things. "

"Voice of the Village", 83 points, "This is a fresh and exciting movie. The tiny details remind people of the existence of the original film series, but it is definitely not a bad remake or copy, Trevor. It has injected fresh imagination and bold new interpretations into the film. Perhaps the film is destined to not create a new world as it did 22 years ago, but at least it is a good start for the series to restart."

"Guardian", eighty-three points, "Perfect choice for summer vacation: fun, refreshing, exciting, thrilling, and even a little absurd to the point of ridiculous weirdness. At the same time, there is a clever twist. We can also ask What? Besides, Renly Hall's light still shines."

"Chicago Tribune", 80 minutes, "If you only need one reason to go to the movie theater, then Lanly-Hall can meet all your requirements for the movie. Undoubtedly, this is his most charming work. Even dinosaurs have become his foil; if you need more reasons, then dinosaurs should get extra points."

"U.S. Weekly", 80 minutes, "After the dinosaurs dominated the cinema on Earth for twenty years, can we still temporarily put down our phones for two hours and put down the ridicule and uprightness that feel good about ourselves, and frankly admit that we are still affected by that? Shocked and sighed by the existence of the group life? Trevoro, he obviously firmly believes this, and his sincerity and focus make every audience willing to admit and drink a little. Hall, he let this point of view More convincing."

Obviously, praise is more objective and more tolerant: for commercial films, they did not make harsh unrealistic requirements, but evaluated on the level of market demand—after all, this is not "interstellar", they can There are more expectations for Christopher Nolan, but Colin Trevoro and Universal Pictures were not prepared to dig deeper at the kernel level, so there is no need at all. UU reading www.uukanshu.cóm

What's more, from "Jurassic Park" to "Jurassic World", audiences have never walked into the movie theater because "the movie explores the coexistence and death relationship between humans and dinosaurs", just like "Great White Sharks". The real classic is definitely not in discussing the importance of protecting the natural environment in general.

All the praises reached a consensus: on the basis of rhythm control and climax paving, "Jurassic World" did meet the requirements, and there were even small surprises. As for the details, everyone has their own feelings, which leads to the difference in ratings, but does not affect the film's excellence.

The most interesting part is not about Lan Li’s praise, but a view derived from the detailed film reviews of the New York Times:

Lanly-Hall once spent a lot of time discussing the revision of the script with Colin Trevor. The lengthy and cumbersome branch lines were cut a lot, reducing a little ambition, and forcing the script to be more condensed and clearer, which undoubtedly improved the quality of the finished product. A step; in addition, the emotional interaction between Renly and Blyth also laid the groundwork and extended the story, which is another detail worthy of attention.

Latest URL:

Note: If you see the content of this chapter is the anti-theft error content, the book is broken, please log in →→