Michael Phillips’ film critics put all the weight on Renly. He not only thought that “the light of the whole movie was concentrated on Renly-Hall”, but also said that “Lenly-Hall’s outstanding performance The performance made the whole work from outstanding to masterpiece", and also emphasized that "this is one of the most moving and outstanding performances in 2011", undoubtedly put all the praise, all the affirmation, and all the good things in this name. The actor who just turned 22 years old before.

With such praise, doesn't Michael worry about "excessive praise"? For young actors, it is easy to get lost in the radiance so early, or it may bring too high expectations, so that the speed of decline will be so fast, and everyone will be obscured in the end. But obviously, this is not something Michael needs to worry about-

"From'buried alive' to'crazy in love', to'anti-cancer me', three works with completely different styles, three completely different characters, and three completely different performances, but they unanimously weigh the performances together. On the shoulder of Renly Hall, and then pointed to the same result: the spirituality displayed by this young actor is amazing and even more admirable! This gives me reason to start looking forward to Renly Hall and Tony. -Kaye’s collaboration."

As the head film critic of the "Hollywood Report", Michael's authority and professionalism are beyond doubt, and his voice of praise represents the prevailing views in the industry. Renly Hall, not Ryan Gosling, nor Jennifer Lawrence, he is a unique existence. With one art work after another, with solid performance time after time, he has conquered step by step. Those picky insiders in Hollywood.

In the fiercely competitive Hollywood, the bayonet is popular in Vanity Fair, and now Lanly has finally taken a place, no longer a rootless duckweed, nor a meteor gliding across the sky. This is true for fans, and so is the industry. This was something that Andy Rogers chose to take over the work "Anti-Cancer Me" was not predictable, but it was also what Andy hoped to see after experiencing the Seattle incident. Because this is what Lan Li deserves.

As a comedy movie, "The Anti-Cancer Me" received such praise, and Renly once again conquered film critics. This was an accident, but not an accident. Following Roger Ebert, Michael also gave a high score of ninety points, and said, "This may be the most suitable movie for the whole family to watch this Christmas."

From Roger of the Chicago Sun to Michael of the Hollywood Reporter, two top film critics evaluated the "anti-cancer me" from the perspective of script and performance, and both received good reviews. At the moment when the Internet news is raging, quietly once again push the "anti-cancer me" to the forefront-with rave reviews.

Because they are not the only two industry insiders who released film reviews in the first place.

After the hustle and bustle of the premiere ended, a total of forty-two media outlets published film reviews. The number of film reviews in the first batch created a new high for this year's autumn and holiday archives, easily recreating the prosperity of the summer and summer archives.

No one can deny that Lionsgate’s small abacus has succeeded. From audiences to film critics to reporters, the "anti-cancer me" is quite an unstoppable posture; what’s more gratifying is that here Among the forty-two reviews, only one had a negative review, eight had a moderate review, and the remaining thirty-three had all given praise!

This makes people involuntarily think of the "bridesmaids" who have received rave reviews in the summer file. Could it be that this year's comedy movie is going to be a big battle?

The only negative review comes from "Rolling Stone." It's not "Entertainment Weekly", but it is not surprising. "Rolling Stone" magazine has never been cold about Lanly's work, not only the film critic Pete Travis, but their music department is no exception.

The album "Don Quixote" only got a bad score of 35 points in "Rolling Stone". Quoting their critics' comments, it was "a groan/groan that feels good about myself and is independent." The banner of music tries to win sympathy, but in the final analysis it is just an assembly line product of expansive arrogance and useless talent."

This time, the "anti-cancer me" was treated similarly.

"Pretentious, irresponsible, dirty and superficial, easy to forget. In this movie, Renly Hall and Seth Logan did their best, just like'Dumb and Gua'. , Constantly beating his head, staring at gold stars, and then trying to make people laugh indifferently while receiving chemotherapy, but the presentation is more gastrointestinal than watching Hall and Rogan Chiguo milk their upper body. An uncomfortable work. A stupid comedy about cancer? I don't think so."

In this film review, Pete can be said to be full of firepower, criticizing the "anti-cancer me" as worthless, whether it is the work itself or the actors, not to mention Lan Li, even in the field of comedy. Seth, who was so victorious, was not able to escape the accusation. In short, the "anti-cancer me" is not only useless, but even a disgusting work.

Of course, Pete's core idea is: It is intolerable to express cancer in such a witty way. Correspondingly, Pete gave a mere 25 points, which also clearly expressed his views on this work.

If I remember correctly, this should be the lowest score of a single critic among all Lanly's works, even worse than the commercial film "Speed ​​and Excitement/Love 5". It can be seen that the "Rolling Stone" magazine is deeply disgusted, and Pete expressed his disgust and rejection in a decisive and affirmative way.

It is a pity that this time, Pete is destined to fight alone, without any comrades-in-arms, and no supporters. Even Lisa Schwartzbaum of "Entertainment Weekly" has "abandoned" Pete.

You know, in the past four works of Lan Li, Lisa has always been dismissive. The sharp pen and cold tone have never given a good face; this time, Lisa seems to be merciful - she No bad reviews were given, only a middle review was given.

"Will Rissel’s semi-autobiographical script is too focused on inner healing and transformation, and at the same time, it’s too artistically processed. It uses too much force to dilute the role of other characters, and the depth of the whole work suddenly However, it flows to the surface. Every character, every stage, every plot can be found in the screenwriter’s abandoned idea warehouse. Fortunately, the stable atmosphere, jokes and sincere emotions make this work The tragedy of falling apart was avoided, and the outstanding performance of Lanly Hall made the movie bearable."

This is a mixed reviews, the gunpoint is aimed at the old script of the script, and the praise is left to the work of the actors and directors. This is not easy for Lisa, but it shows the advantages and disadvantages of the movie.

Although many people think that Lisa’s comments this time are a bit softer and have no previous edge, the main reason is that "Entertainment Weekly" is on the cusp of the storm, and the condemnation of netizens makes them miserable, Cornell McGray Ge even underwent unimaginable tremendous pressure, which caused the magazine to become more cautious in its follow-up processing; however, Lisa gave a passing score of 60 points, which is still objective and pertinent to some extent. Expressed her point of view.

Beyond this, the "anti-cancer me" ushered in a frenzy of undifferentiated praise, once again.

Roger of the "Chicago Sun" gave 88 points, and Michael of the "Hollywood Reporter" gave 90 points. This is an extremely rare achievement for a comedy film, but in fact, in the first Among the critical comments, there was no provocation, which made people once again see the scene of "Juneo" when it was released-strictly speaking, there is more than it is!

Only one full score appeared in the 38 comments of "Juneo", and four full scores appeared in the 42 comments of "The Anti-Cancer Me"!

"USA Today", 100 points, "Every performance in this movie is perfect! Especially...Hall, Hall, Hall! On that youthful, vigorous and handsome face, But it carries the soul of a movie, a life, and a world! Perfect, or perfect!"

"Voice of the Village", 100 points, "Life is full of countless possibilities. Cancer can be the beginning of destroying the world, but it can also be the starting point for rebuilding the world. This is the simplest truth, but it is also the most difficult part of life. . Undoubtedly, this is the most enjoyable, relaxing, and happiest work to watch movies since 2011. It is worth mentioning that Lanly Hall once again dedicated a master-level performance, he let Seth-Ro Gen's ridicule and playfulness seem a bit clumsy, and it also makes the nerd look incredibly sexual/feeling."

"Empire", 100 points, "'Anti-Cancer Me' is a wonderful movie, full of infinite humor and fun, but it doesn't mean it can't move people~lightnovelpub.net~ laugh with tears , Bittersweet, touching and happy together. The performance of a group of actors was an unexpected surprise, especially Lanly Hall! I now finally understand the reason for those crazy screams."

"Chicago Tribune", 100 points, "For most of the film, this is a work of joy, sadness, happiness, pain, beauty, and sourness. It makes all the mixed and deep emotions so beautiful and moving. Mixed together, it is easy to impress every audience. The biggest surprise, Lan Li-Hall, audiences watching movies will dislocate their jaws; the biggest regret, Lan Li-Hall, when can this nerd take off his Top? He is really sexual/feels smoking."

Full score, full score, or full score. Only in the first batch of reviews, "Anti-Cancer Me" received a full four full points, which is a far cry from the 25 points of "Rolling Stone", as if the South Pole and the North Pole, Shows a completely different posture. But fortunately, in the midst of these extreme praises and criticisms, there are more pertinent comments that can be used as references.

Judging from the scores of the media review, it is clear that the side who praised the entry is gaining the upper hand-absolute upper hand! It now appears that Lan Li's undefeated record will continue. () "Big Play Bone" only represents the author's view of Qiqijia d Maomao. If it is found that its content violates national laws and conflicts, please delete it. The position is only to provide a healthy and green reading platform. 【】,thank you all!