The Monster I Was Redeemed

v2 Chapter 136: Chinese test

Genius to remember the address of this site in one second: []https://The fastest update! No ads!

After the lunch break, Yu Xin walked into the classroom fifteen minutes early with the sealed test paper and storage bag.

It's just an afternoon break.

In other words, there must be a lot of people going from the dormitory to the teaching building.

But today, there is not a single empty seat in the classroom.

The vast majority of people are waiting.

Seeing the attitude of the students in the class, Yu Xin nodded indifferently.

As for Ai Liang in the corner of the first row, he was directly ignored by him.

At this stage, any preaching is meaningless, because grades are irrefutable facts.

If Ai Liang's grades are not good, Yu Xin has an excuse to educate him.

"Before the exam, let me briefly talk about exam discipline."

Yu Xin put the paper bag on the podium: "First, regarding cheating, anyone found cheating, no matter what form or means, will be expelled from the key class! There is no room for negotiation!"

"Second, during the exam, everyone's mobile phone must be handed in. Even if you don't bring it, bring it to my dormitory now. Now, hand in the mobile phone in the order of seats."

Yu Xin said, hanging the storage bag on the edge of the podium.

Judging from the performance of the class, no one should have left their mobile phones in the dormitory.

Ai Liang's seat was No. 1, and he was the first to put his phone in the storage bag.

Followed by Ye Qing, Yi Wenna...

Fang Xinlei's front desk saw that Fang Xinlei had difficulty moving, and wanted to help her bring her mobile phone.

As a result, Fang Xinlei had a cold face, ignoring the other party's good intentions, and walked to the podium with crutches.

It made her mutter in a low voice, "What a weirdo..."

This exam is not a formal exam, and the invigilators are all teachers of various subjects.

The first test of the thorough examination was the Chinese language taught by Yu Xin.

The exam papers that Ai Liang and the others did were all given by the school teachers themselves. The difficulty and the exam papers that were available on the market were not of the same order of magnitude.

Perhaps it was for the purpose of inspiring students' confidence that the subject of Chinese was put in the first course.

After all, in the subject of Chinese, even Jin Ping'an can write something.

If it were changed to other subjects, I am afraid that after completing the multiple-choice questions, he would start staring at the paper.

The class bell rang and the exam officially began.

For Jin Ping'an, Chinese is one of the few subjects he can write twice.

But for Ai Liang, this kind of text-based questions actually affected his speed.

Word count is one thing.

In the science test paper, when Ai Liang saw the question type, the problem-solving ideas and steps would appear in his mind, and then he could get the answer in an instant.

And comprehension questions like Chinese.

He first had to read short essays and analyze the main idea.

Unlike mathematics, which can be solved with formulas.

Short essays, each of which has its own content to express.

You have to read and understand before you can answer.

Therefore, Ai Liang usually writes very slowly in the two subjects of Chinese and social.

This is very slow, relative to the speed when he was doing science.

In the eyes of others, Ai Liang's problem-solving speed is still terrifying.

For example, when Chen Zili had just finished his first short essay, Ai Liang had already started his final composition.

The composition of the Chinese test here is not the kind of composition that gives you an event or a topic and asks you to write a propositional composition.

Not saying there isn't, just a small chance.

At least in the college entrance examination of the Asian Federation, at most four out of ten times are propositional essays.

The remaining six times are all excerpts and analyses of the contents of famous works.

These masterpieces cover philosophy, literature, and even modern social sciences.

For example, "Who do you think has influenced you the most?" "What do you think about modern society?" "What difficult choices have you faced? How did you overcome them?" and so on.

As long as you have read the relevant books, you can find the standard answer from the book, and you can get at least 20 points if you copy it directly.

If you haven't read it, you can only analyze it yourself.

If your analysis is brilliant and reasonable, you can also get high marks.

But if your analysis fails to impress the examiners, it is not related to the standard answers in the book.

It's a pity that you can't get one of these thirty points.

The composition questions of this thorough examination are very tricky, and the questions are excerpted from a book called "Logic and Sensibility".

Allows you to analyze rationality and sensibility, their respective manifestations to society.

The full score for Chinese is 100%. This composition, which accounts for 30%, is actually such a topic.

That's a bit of a no-brainer.

Serious high school student, who would read this stuff?

Yu Xinming pretended to be making things difficult for the students in the key class, so that he could give them a slap in the face.

Coincidentally, however, Ai Liang happened to read this book when he was a child.

This question is exactly what the second chapter is about.

Ai Liang recalled the contents of this book from the memory bank, and then copied the analysis of the second chapter intact.

To be on the safe side, he added 200 words of personal opinion.

………………

Short essays, each of which has its own content to express.

You have to read and understand before you can answer.

Therefore, Ai Liang usually writes very slowly in the two subjects of Chinese and social.

This is very slow, relative to the speed when he was doing science.

In the eyes of others, Ai Liang's problem-solving speed is still terrifying.

For example, when Chen Zili had just finished his first short essay, Ai Liang had already started his final composition.

The composition of the Chinese test here is not the kind of composition that gives you an event or a topic and asks you to write a propositional composition.

Not saying there isn't, just a small chance.

At least in the college entrance examination of the Asian Federation, at most four out of ten times are propositional essays.

The remaining six times are all excerpts and analyses of the contents of famous works.

These masterpieces cover philosophy, literature, and even modern social sciences.

For example, "Who do you think has influenced you the most?" "What do you think about modern society?" "What difficult choices have you faced? How did you overcome them?" and so on.

As long as you have read the relevant books, you can find the standard answer from the book, and you can get at least 20 points if you copy it directly.

If you haven't read it, you can only analyze it yourself.

If your analysis is brilliant and reasonable, you can also get high marks.

But if your analysis fails to impress the examiners, it is not related to the standard answers in the book.

It's a pity that you can't get one of these thirty points.

The composition questions of this thorough examination are very tricky, and the questions are excerpted from a book called "Logic and Sensibility".

Let you analyze the manifestations of reason and emotion~lightnovelpub.net~ to society.

The full score for Chinese is 100%. This composition, which accounts for 30%, is actually such a topic.

That's a bit of a no-brainer.

Serious high school student, who would read this stuff?

Yu Xinming pretended to be making things difficult for the students in the key class, so that he could give them a slap in the face.

Coincidentally, however, Ai Liang happened to read this book when he was a child.

This question is exactly what the second chapter is about.

Ai Liang recalled the contents of this book from the memory bank, and then copied the analysis of the second chapter intact.

To be on the safe side, he added 200 words of personal opinion.

7017k