, The fastest update to the latest chapter of Blackstone Password!

At least I won't lose!

This has met Lynch's requirements for the current situation.

A large number of newspapers reported the news, and the Buppen Times, which had been bad news every moment a few days ago, stood up again, saying that this was the beginning of a new legend every moment.

Their editor-in-chief highly praised Lynch's skills in the report, saying that with his intervention, he has stopped the current downward trend every moment and is optimistic about many evaluation agencies, and is expected to create new miracles.

There are also some shops in Bupen local all the time, and they are also "stolen" from the counter all the time.

Just as everyone expected, the first trial began.

A total of 24 stores in Buppen unilaterally tore up the agreement with every moment. Before the contract was not fulfilled, they removed the every moment counter without authorization. The court accepted the case and proceeded to hear the case.

With the help of Shi Hao Luck and Colorful, the twenty-four shopkeepers hired a barrister who was willing to represent them in this litigation "for free".

According to Buppen's market, if you want this barrister to file a lawsuit for yourself, it will cost at least a hundred thousand to several hundred thousand, or even more.

He told the media that the reason why he did this was to not want capitalists to use the wealth and power in their hands to use legal weapons indiscriminately, making the law a sharp knife in the hands of capitalists to "slaughter" the people.

His remarks aroused a lot of heated discussions in the society. Many people think that he is the true conscientious lawyer of the federal government and a moral model of the lawyer industry.

It's just that they don't know. Before he announced "free", he received a 300,000 lawyer's agency fee presented to him by kind people.

Shi Hao Luck and Ducai are reluctant to go off the court personally and fight every moment. They need a lawsuit to determine what they will encounter after they leave the court.

On such a pleasant weekend, the Buppen City Court opened.

After the plaintiff's lawyer expressed his opinion, the judge looked at the attorney representing the dock and said, "Is there anything the defendant's lawyer needs to say?"

When he asked questions, he looked down at some explanatory documents in front of him. In fact, there was no need for a formal hearing in this case at all, and the sentence could be pronounced directly by going to the fast court.

From the judge's point of view, the breach of contract by these defendants is very obvious. No matter what reason they have, they have caused the fait accompli of breach of contract.

Moreover, the only litigation proposition in this case is a lawsuit against breach of contract to recover liquidated damages. It is simple and clear. If this is placed in a fast court, a sentence can be pronounced in two minutes at most.

It's just that the society and the media are paying attention to this matter now, and it is a group of the bottom of the society that is being sued every moment. Some rights agencies are paying close attention to this matter, and they have to put it in the court for trial.

Look at the row of cameras at the back to see how much people are paying attention to this case.

The defendant's lawyer stood up, "Your Honor, I have two declarations."

The judge nodded, and he couldn't help but give this guy a chance to speak.

All barristers, in addition to their ability to surpass others, are more of their social network.

Once the most famous barrister in the Union, the success rate of cases represented by him is one of the best in the entire federal judicial history.

His own excellence is only one aspect, and the more reason is his father——

Growing up from a judge of a local court to a judge of the Federal Supreme Court, this is the main reason why he can always guarantee his winning rate.

Later, his father failed when he was running for justice for life, and the barrister gradually faded out of people's sight, leaving only some myths in the industry.

Like the defendant’s lawyer, there are also some connections in the judiciary, and it happens that the judge knows this.

"The first point is that this case is not a completely isolated case. Before the occurrence of this case, the defendants whom I represented had actually sued the court for breach of contract all the time..."

While he was talking, his assistant delivered some materials to the judge's table.

Judges and prosecutors and others each have a copy.

While they looked over, the defendant’s lawyer continued to say, “It can be seen from the initiation of these lawsuits that the plaintiff actually breached the contract unilaterally, and my agent is solving the problem through legal channels.”

"There is a sequence for this, so..."

The lawyers at all times raised their hands very casually, "I oppose the defendant's lawyer's statement, Your Honor, the litigation propositions in this case are very clear, and there are no problems mentioned by the defendant's lawyer."

"We have not breached the contract in any form. We have sufficient supply at all times, and we can deliver goods anytime, anywhere."

"Unilateral litigation, and there is no court trial, and there is no specific trial result. I think it has no reference value and significance in this case."

The judge was silent for a while and nodded, "The objection is valid, the defendant's lawyer, the lawsuits you mentioned have not yet had judicial results."

"Before it is certain that the plaintiff has breached the contract first, it has formed an inevitable relationship with this case. Your statement has no meaning."

The defendant's lawyer's thinking is very clear. Let the plaintiff first, that is, be the first to breach the contract at all times. As long as the justice recognizes this, then the litigation against all shopkeepers at every moment will be meaningless.

Why?

Because after every moment of breach of contract, the shopkeepers have unilaterally terminated the contract-this is a decision made under the precondition of breach of contract every moment, and it will also be recognized and protected by justice.

In this way, no matter what the content of the counterclaim is at every moment, there is no threat to the shopkeepers.

It's a pity that today's judge is not so good at hand skating, or that he is not on the defendant's side.

There are many things that you do not say that you violated the contract if you breached the contract. The Federation is a country under the rule of law. The law has not said that the contract is breached every moment. You should first say that he has breached the contract. Who is listening?

There is no doubt that we must listen to the final explanation from the judicial department.

The defendant's lawyer glanced sideways at his opponent on the other side, and said, "There is another question, Your Honor, I think the loss of the counter every moment is not an accident."

"According to the information I collected, more than 2,000 stores across the country have been sued for breach of contract every moment because they lost their counters. I have reason to believe that this is actually an attempt to obstruct justice."

"Some despicable methods have been adopted at all times to steal that kind of counter, and use this as a means of attack to prosecute ordinary people who intend to use the law to protect their rights and interests. This case has been dealt with after another case is closed."

The "another case" mentioned by the defendant's lawyer was an incident in which more than 2,000 stores reported the theft of their counters at the same time. The defendant's lawyer meant that only after the thief was found, could the nature of the case be determined.

Every moment the attorney attorney raised his hand again, "I oppose the defendant's argument, Your Honor."

"If the defendant's lawyer does not have definitive and valid evidence to prove his point of view, then I will sue him for defamation."

The judge frowned, and this time he did not immediately support the plaintiff's lawyer's complaint.

Because he knew that what the defendant's lawyer said was not necessarily wrong.

Suddenly there were more than two thousand "fraud cases" all over the country. What's more outrageous was that the other party didn't want anything, that is, they dragged away the counters of every moment. It has nothing to do with every moment. That is absolutely impossible.

Even the judge thought of every moment, or that Lynch would arrange according to the plaintiff mentioned on the subpoenas, otherwise there would be no such coincidence.

Most of the plaintiffs who sued Lynch were deceived from the counter every moment?

But the Federation is a country ruled by law. Everyone can have any point of view. Some people even come out now and say that the president is actually an alien, and his purpose is to control the world without any problems.

Expressing your ideas on any occasion is the most basic right that the charter gives everyone in the Federation, but if you want your claims, your views, and get judicial support, you must show evidence.

Some people will think this is stupid. Everyone knows that it must have something to do with every moment. They also say what evidence is needed. This must be a cover-up behavior.

But having said that, if you don’t need evidence because “everyone thinks,” and there are definitely more “everyones” of capitalists than ordinary people, then will the capitalists say what they say in the future?

So sometimes it seems that the rules make things difficult for ordinary people, but in fact it is to better protect ordinary people.

Whether what the defendant's lawyer said was fact or not, but what is important is evidence.

The judge looked at the defendant's lawyer, "How do you prove what you said."

The defendant's lawyer shook his head, "I can't prove it, so I hope to temporarily postpone the sentence of this lawsuit~lightnovelpub.net~ and add another trial after the fraud case is over to try this case again."

The judge is very hesitant. Once he makes a decision, other courts and other judges may use his decision as a reference. This is also the consensus of the judiciary.

It seems that there is nothing to put away, but in turn, for every moment, they become the loser.

The judge looked up at the plaintiff's lawyer. This was a very subtle and profound action. He was telling the plaintiff's lawyer that you can object and I will support you.

This kind of statement is like some kind of unspoken rules. Outsiders don't understand these rules and these small actions, and the plaintiff's lawyer should understand.

It is somewhat surprising that the plaintiff’s lawyer did not raise any objections, just like... he seems to be supporting such a decision.

"Take a break for ten minutes. We want to discuss whether we support the defendant's proposition..."

The judge knocked on the gavel and walked away from the side door with a group of people. They had to figure out what was going on all the time.